CDYF-Dialogue

This is the newsletter archive for China Development Youth Forum, and your idea banks for development issues! :)
Please visit our website at: http://cdyf.stanford.edu
Suggestions and comments please contact us via: cdyf.inquiry@gmail.com

Calendar
Category
All (15)
Economics (1)
Education (2)
Environment (3)
Newsletter (4)
Unsorted (5)
Insite Search
Links
Contact Us
Newsletter Subscribe
China Development Youth Forum
Facebook Site
Forum for China Branch

订阅 RSS

0009115


« 上一篇: Low-Cost PC, Why Not Free? 下一篇: Newsletter 8.15 »
CDYF.Dialogue @ 2007-08-14 04:21

by Fan GAO*

On June the 24th, 2007, Beijing announced its official slogan for the 2008 Olympics, ‘One World, One Dream’. The slogan conveys China’s desire to create a bright future for people all around the world, according to Liu Qi, president of BOCOG, the organizing committee for China’s 2008 Olympics. Yet even in China, a universal dream for everyone appears too Utopian to be able to materialize – if one were to take a look at its rural villages. 

A recent survey conducted by Asian Development Bank (ADB) sees China’s Gini Coefficient rising from 0.41 in 1993 to 0.47 in 2004, and thus putting China ahead of the United States (which has a Gini Coefficient of 0.46) in the list of countries where income is the most unequally distributed. Although consequences of income disparity are slow in unraveling, tragedies happen. In March, 2007, a stand-off between villagers and over 1500 police and paramilitary force in Hunan Province ended in a bloodshed that cost the life of a middle school student. The incident, triggered by a doubling of bus fares during the Chinese New Year holiday, shows how far-fetched the dream of a bright future appears to some of China’s rural residents. 

The Central Government is not unwilling to initiate some changes. In the most recent session of the National People’s Congress, $ 392bn was announced to be spent on rural development in 2007, a big improvement from a rather shabby $ 52bn in 2006. The increase in budget was accompanied by a host of initiatives such as the passing of a property law reiterating the need to compensate the farmers adequately for expropriation of their land, and a campaign for abolishing school fees for the first nine years of education, a measure that has since a long time ago taken effect in China’s developed urban areas.  

All with excellent intentions. Yet villagers have no illusion about the probity or competency of China’s local officials to carry them out according to the originators’ intent. Firstly, some projects demand too much co-operation between various levels of the government: so instead of sharing the responsibility, officials chose to shift the blame. Secondly, local governments are often involved in the unfair expropriation of farmers’ land – they use their power to seize the land, lease it to developers, and collect massive profits. The increased subsidies ended up in the strongboxes of village officials, who chose at their own liberty to pack classrooms with unqualified teachers, at the villagers’ expense. 

Meanwhile, poverty prevails. 11% of the population still lives on less than $ 1 per day, with no access to healthcare, social service or basic education. Yes, the number is decreasing, thanks to rapid economic growth, and more relaxed government policies on employment in urban areas by rural villagers – but not fast enough. Productivity in the agricultural section is still trailing, with more efficient farming methods, modern machineries and high-yielding seed varieties yet to be adopted. 

We used to dream of an independent China – together. Paradigm has since shifted, and when faced with a plethora of competing agendas, the Central Government seems to be pursuing a dream that’s not for everyone. Maybe it’s time to pick up those who are left behind, and start to dream together – once again.


*Fan GAO ( gaofantasia@gmail.com) will study in Columbia University this fall. She is a core member of China Development Youth Forum and manager of our Facebook Group.

 

Related Articles/ Background Readings:
China:  a shared poverty to uneven wealth?
'One World One Dream' selected as the Theme Slogan for Beijing 2008 Olympic Games

 
 



最新评论


m

2007-08-15 16:12 匿名 61.188.*.*

elaborated nonsense. jianding wanbi

Dear m, thanks for your comments.
Is that because you think the inequality is so proverbially that it doesn't worth mentioning? :) Personally I think there are still many people (eg, urban kids) unaware of the severe situation and Fan wants to call for attention.
If you have further suggestions, welcome to contact us! :)


Joe

2007-08-15 23:36 匿名 117.24.*.*

I  believe the transformation will take some time. Immediate effect is ridiculous.

Yes, but there's progress :)


m

2007-08-16 00:02 匿名 61.188.*.*

Sorry to have the author feel bad about this comment. I'm just flaming... well... But, if an urban kid can read English like this, he can have some news either more neutral or propagandizing from an opposite direction, which will usually bring a better judgment just as this article can. (OK, nothing forbids the blooming CDYF to have yet another "Save the children!" just as Blabla Times, or Blabla China)
However, this essay is a little inadequate in presenting the facts, the data work well on a pamphlet (which most people wouldn't need), but not a respectable discussion of the problem. Furthermore, the essay stinks in that it is equipped not only with a moral (Kleine Kinder, Kleine Sorgen!), but with one like
>> Maybe it’s time to pick up those who are left behind, and start to dream together – once again
This would hardly appeal to anyone who had their (PC intended) basic understanding on how the Chinese society works. (It may also be that capitals and provincials sometimes think of problems differently. Just some wild guess, though.)
Anyway, if this essay is intended to be translated into Chinese and stuffed into everyone's mailbox, it would be nice. Yet my personal pigheadedness would deem actual discussions on specific problems in the modern China be more on-topic than this expression which may hardly generate any reflections. (READ: I love trolls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28internet%29 ))



m

2007-08-16 00:33 匿名 61.188.*.*

and "some time" is ridiculous too

I appreciate the explanation about the earlier comment. I admit I am ill-informed about how well-informed Chinese students are about China development issues. Being among the ill-informed myself must have clouded my judgement.

I apologize for eschewing novelty. I intended to inform, but ended up reiterating the obvious. The article, however, remains informative rather than argumentative in nature - so the absence of provoking claims, or 'actual discussions', was an intended omission. I was not planning to be original in the first place because too many 'discussions' are turning into battles between competing egos.

-Fan Gao

评论 / 个人网页 / 扔小纸条
* 昵称

已经注册过? 请登录

新用户请先注册 以便能显示头像及追踪评论回复

Email
网址
* 评论
表情
 


 

分类小组论坛
杂谈 , 娱乐、八卦 , 文学、艺术 , 体育 , 旅游、同城 , 象牙塔 , 情感 , 时尚、生活 , 星座 , 科技

请注意遵守中华人民共和国法律法规, 如威胁到本站生存, 将依法向有关部门报告, 同时本站的相关记录可能成为对您不利的证据.

相关法律法规
全国人大常委会关于维护互联网安全的决定
中华人民共和国计算机信息系统安全保护条例
中华人民共和国计算机信息网络国际联网管理暂行规定
计算机信息网络国际联网安全保护管理办法
计算机信息系统国际联网保密管理规定